Monday, April 25, 2022

Upcoming Units and Advanced Notice

 Is it a good idea to tell students and parents in advance about the themes and topics you plan to teach?

Sometimes, I'm not sure how to answer that question.

This year, I teach social studies, media, health, problem solving (one of the four frames for kindergarten learning) and library. I also have collaborative partner teaching times. Three recent examples involve giving some prior notification and the results from that news.

Health - Human Development and Sexual Health

According to the 2019 version of the Grades 1-8  Ontario Curriculum for Physical and Health Education,

Principals and teachers must follow their board’s policy that allows for students to be exempted, at their parents’ request, from instruction related to the Grade 1 to 8 human development and sexual health expectations in strand D.

I teach Health to a Grade 1-2, Grade 2-3 and Grade 3 class. I calculated approximately when I would begin and end these units and included the dates in the letter that gets sent home. Letters are grade-specific, so the Grade 1s receive a different letter than the Grade 2s, and so on.

The results of this notification is that I've had several families request exemptions for their children, even though I am uncertain whether or not they understood the information that was sent home. Unfortunately, there are no translated versions of the very wordy, lengthy form letter we must send. I have to trust that they knew and understood; I don't want to call into question their decisions. There are only four lessons I'm giving on this topic (in May 2022). I'm not sure where the children will go when I'm teaching these four lessons; I guess I will need to discuss this with my principal.

Social Studies - Communities in Canada 1780-1850 (& Minecraft)

Minecraft is not an official part of the Ontario Curriculum for Social Studies. However, I am a big proponent of games-based learning and my past experience with Minecraft has taught me that it's a powerful, motivating tool for students to explore concepts and make connections.

Last term, I took the Grade 2s to create a stop-motion animated mini-film and the Grade 3s insisted that I take them afterwards to do something equally as "cool". I decided I would use Minecraft and to try and encourage a student in the class who traditionally balks at completing work, I told him in advance about our plans. Almost every day for the subsequent 2-3 weeks before we launched the unit, he'd approach me (often at the most inconvenient times) to whisper "Min-Craft" to me.

Once the rest of the class knew, similar interactions occurred.  We made a list of "In-School Use of Minecraft Do and Don't Rules" and had to include lines such as "We do not pester or bother our classroom teacher about when we are playing Minecraft - it's with Mrs. Mali during our Partner Social Studies time". 

The Grade 3s talk a big game about being Minecraft experts but I suspect that's a lot of bravado since much of the most recent social studies periods involving Minecraft have meant a lot of technology trouble-shooting. During our first official session playing, we could only get four of the class Chromebooks to run Minecraft, despite the best efforts of the Grade 4-5s, who have been using Minecraft for their science projects without much issue. Knowing there were only four working spots, I next created learning centers for Grade 3 social studies, with Minecraft being just one of the four tasks. All of a sudden, the four working stations dropped down to two; the students said they just couldn't launch the program. It can be a little frustrating, especially when the focus is not supposed to be on the game, but on the insights linked to social studies that comes from the game. 





Media - Cakes

I only teach media to the kindergarten students and the Grade 1-2 in-person class. The kindergartens are busy with their current media unit on decision making (and using lists to help the process and games to practice the process). Now that the Grade 1-2s have completed their Playground unit, we are examining cakes. To get them excited, I told them that a future lesson would involve them decorating their own cakes. (I plan on buying Jos Louis or Vachon Moon cakes for them to use - they are bigger than a cupcake but not as big as a traditional cake, and we don't have to bake them ourselves.) 

Ever since I told them we were going to do this, whenever I pick them up to bring them to the library (for library, media, or health), at least one person is bound to ask, "Are we decorating the cakes today?" I had to explain that there were many other tasks we were going to do first, including consult with a professional cake decorator. Now, the new question is "Are we seeing the cake maker today?"


I'm glad that the students are excited about these upcoming lessons; I just wish that these engaging events didn't dwarf the other learning happening regularly.




Monday, April 18, 2022

It Takes Teamwork

This past week was Holiday Central: Easter for Christians, the continuation of Ramadan for Muslims, Passover for Jews, Vaisakhi for Sikhs, Puthandu for Tamils and Hindus ...

If any of these holidays involve family celebrations for you, it's quite clear that it takes the effort of more than a single person to make it a wonderful event. There have been several non-holiday milestones that have occurred recently that would not have been possible without a team of people working together.

1) The creation of a Library Ad Hoc Committee in ETT



It has taken years but finally, at the All General Meeting held on April 13, 2022 for the Elementary Teachers of Toronto, a motion was brought to the floor to establish a Library Ad Hoc Committee, and it passed!

This is the original text of the motion:

Mover: Wendy Burch Jones         Seconder: Diana Maliszewski 

Whereas thirty years of international research have established that the active presence and participation of qualified library staff make a significant positive difference in student academic achievement; and Whereas school libraries are critical to successful online learning, ensuring students achieve curriculum objectives, and curating the digital and print resources students need to succeed; and Whereas cuts to library staffing across the province continue to be a troubling trend; 

Move that ETT establish an Ad Hoc Library Committee to support teacher-librarian members and advocate for libraries and librarianship in our school communities.

I was pleased to be the seconder of this important motion but due to time constraints, I was unable to see it through to its completion. Huge thanks to fellow teacher-librarian Andrea Kwok for stepping up and becoming the new seconder. I am told it nearly passed unanimously, with 92% voting in favour. 

Thank you to all the attendees of the ETT AGM that voted to support the creation of this committee. Thank you to Lisa, Kate, Moyah and Wendy, who offered when asked to be part of the committee even before it was a reality. Thank you to the ETT executive officers who read our email requests and attempted to bring up the topic at the ETT executive meetings. Big thanks to Johanna Lawler who paved the way when she helped establish a Library Ad Hoc Committee in her local union and publicly documented the process so others could follow.

2) The relaunch of the Forest of Reading Quiz Bowl

It will be smaller than in the past, and shorter, and virtual, but the Quiz Bowl is back! Big thanks to Kim at Military Trail P.S., Salma at Percy Williams Jr. P.S. and Jennifer at Macklin P.S. for taking the leap and agreeing to participate. Thanks to Martha Martin and Jennifer Brown for helping us to book Leslie Gentle as our guest author.

I realized that I've never shared the document that the early adopters created to explain how Quiz Bowl is organized. I will reproduce it here (especially so I can cite it in a research paper I'm co-writing - see point #4).

*****************

TDSB NE4 FoS

Annual Silver Birch Quiz Bowl

Procedures


A Brief History


The Ontario Library Association’s Silver Birch Awards were created in 1994. 2005 was the first year that several schools in our “family” gathered together to celebrate the Silver Birch Awards. 2009 was the first year that we incorporated a “quiz bowl” element to the festivities. The first NE4 Silver Birch Quiz Bowl was held at Whitehaven Jr. P.S. and Brookside P.S hosted the second. The prize, two silver booklets created by Claire Perrin (one for fiction, one for non-fiction) is kept at the winning school for a year and the winning team members write their names in it as a record of their victory.


Team Formation and Regulations


Every school that chooses to participate sends a team of students. There can be a fiction team and a non-fiction team as two separate groups.


The number of students on a school’s team cannot exceed ten. There can be less.


Every student team member is responsible for knowing 1-2 books well. Students should be aware of their focus books. 


Teacher-Librarian Requirements and Restrictions


The teacher-librarian of a participating school is expected to create quiz bowl questions. The amount of books a teacher-librarian has to prepare questions for is determined by the amount of participating schools. Usually ten questions per book will suffice. Non-fiction book questions are most often created as multiple-choice questions due to the heavy content. 


Teacher-librarians are forbidden from using the exact Quiz Bowl questions they prepare with their students ahead of time.


Competition Day Procedures


Buzzers (from Eggspert) are set up at the front of the room / stage.

Depending on the number of schools participating, there may be two buzzer systems set up with questions alternating between the two tables. (There are six buzzer spots for each Eggspert system.)


When the book title is announced, the students responsible for representing their school for that book come forward to sit in front of their buzzer. The teacher that has created the questions is the question reader. Another teacher is used as the spotter, to see which buzzer colour answers first (it is very clear, as the first one in blocks all others from answering, but it still helps the flow). Another teacher is responsible for keeping score. One point is given for each correct answer. Scores are not announced.


After all ten books have been quizzed, the scorekeeper comes forward to announce the runner up and the winner. 


Other Logistics to the Day


Author Visit = Usually, we arrange to have one or two authors come to talk to the students. The cost of the author is shared equally among all schools (so if an author costs $500 and 10 schools came to the Quiz Bowl, each school regardless of the number of children they bring would pay $50). The author is booked through Authors Booking Service, an organization run by Marsha Skrypuch and Valerie Sherrard. When possible, we try to arrange to have some of the author’s books for sale and for autographing. Books are arranged through Tinlids, a company run by Maria Martella. Students are only allowed to receive autographs in proper autograph books or in books they have bought / brought by the author – scraps of paper are NOT allowed. 


Transportation = Depending on which school is the host; other schools can choose to walk, take the TTC or book a school bus. Many schools will pair up to share a school bus.


Lunch = Because this is often an all-day event, students must bring a lunch. The host school provides a space for the visiting students to eat. The event usually runs from 10-2.


Other Activities = We try to make the day more active by doing different things. In our first year, each school created and performed a Silver Birch chant. In our second year, we all learned the “Gotta Keep Reading” song and sang together. The nature of these other activities will be determined by the NE4 planning committee that assembles each year.


Cost = Costs depend on the divided cost of the author and the transportation method. 


*****************

3) The relaunch of the Red Maple Marketing Campaign

Different group, similar concept - Samantha at David Lewis P.S. and Jennifer at Macklin P.S. will join me this year in coordinating the relaunch of this event, which was last held in 2019. Again, Martha and Jennifer have assisted us with obtaining the wonderful Philippa Dowding (who actually was our guest for Quiz Bowl back in 2012!). I have my fingers crossed that the advertising company that has provided our judges will continue to support us in making this an authentic experience for our Grade 7-8 student teams. 

Below is the document that explains the process.

***************************

TDSB (NE4) ER19-ER20 FoS

Annual Red Maple Marketing Celebration

Procedures


A Brief History


The Ontario Library Association’s Red Maple Awards were created in 1998, (with the first Red Maple Non-Fiction prize awarded in 2005). 2012 was the first year that the former NE4 Family of Schools held a joint celebration. The schools that attended the inaugural event were: Agnes Macphail P.S., Banting and Best P.S., Brookside P.S., Mary Shadd P.S., Milliken P.S. and Thomas L. Wells P.S.  and it was held at the Malvern Branch of the Toronto Public Library.


Team Formation and Regulations


Every school that chooses to participate sends a team of students. 


The number of students on a school’s team cannot exceed ten. There can be less. More can work on the project at school but lack of space means only ten can represent the project on the actual day.


Every student team member will have contributed somehow to the creation of their group’s Marketing Campaign. 


Guidelines and Process

(Times will be underlined.)


  1. The coordinator and planning committee select a date, site (if different from the traditional Toronto Public Library partnership) and Red Maple author visitor. This task should occur in March if consulting with potential school participants, and earlier if pre-selected by the committee.

  2. Schools contact the designated coordinator and indicate that they agree to participate. A firm commitment must be made by the week after March Break. Individual schools can determine how it will run (e.g. a class as part of a media assignment, a club on a voluntary basis, etc.)

  3. The coordinator randomly draws names of the nominated Red Maple titles from that year and assigns them to participating schools. The schools are notified via email about their chosen title, at least six weeks prior to the actual event.

  4. Schools groups / teams will devise a marketing campaign for the book they are assigned. The learning goal is to create an effective advertising / marketing campaign. The list of criteria is left open so that teams can be as innovative and creative as possible.

  5. Schools will submit their entry fee to the coordinator or chosen committee member about three weeks prior to the event. The cost will depend on the number of schools participating, the fee the visiting author charges, and whether or not the visit is subsidized. The entry fee may be used to pay for the author visit, purchasing good paper for participation certificates, prizes for the winning team, food and/or other incidentals. A breakdown of the costs incurred will be included on the receipt issued to every school that pays. (In the past, the entry fee was about $50 per school.)

  6. The judging will be conducted by objective third party members. The judging committee will consist of an odd number of adults, with at least one representative from a marketing firm or advertising agency. Judges should be invited in early March if at all possible to confirm availability.

  7. Teachers will coordinate the use and transportation of any supplies or resources their student groups will need as part of their marketing campaign. Because the Toronto Public Library’s wireless Internet access is not always compatible with TDSB tools or reliable, it is recommended that non-Internet-reliant methods be used (e.g. save your video on a memory stick / take screen shots of the Twitter hashtag use / bring your own laptops). Field trip forms will be available for teachers to submit to their principals (Form 511A) and to the participating students (Form 511C) three weeks prior to the event

  8. On the day of the event, teachers will bring their student groups to the host site (via car, TTC, bus, walking, or whatever method deemed best). Students will set up their materials on reserved tables. At some point during the day, everyone will have a “gallery walk” to examine all the projects. Time will be allotted for lunch. (Students must bring their own packed lunch, unless otherwise instructed; an ice cream vendor will be present for dessert sales.) Time will also be given to our author visit.

  9. During the official “Campaign Pitch”, each group will have no more than five minutes to present their campaign. 

  10. Near the end of the day of the event, students will receive certificates of participation and the judges will announce an overall winner, as well as any honourable mentions. The winning group will receive a token prize (either donated books, gift cards to book stores, or movie passes). 

  11. Either the day of the event or shortly thereafter, each group will receive written feedback from the judges on their campaigns.


***************************

4) The assembly of a cross-division research team for TMC7

I absolutely adored working with Mark, Dawn, Wafaa, Kim, and Wendy on the TDSB Library Expected Practices document update project back in June-July 2021. What I especially appreciated was the understanding that grew between the elementary and secondary teacher-librarians about the unique roles they play in their schools. I've been itching for an opportunity to work with some of those talented TLs again (and you can see from point #1 that Wendy and I have been busy, and not just with union projects). While chatting with my friend Sarah Wheatley, whom I've been learning with and from since 2014, we discussed the possibility of investigating how elementary and secondary school library professionals could work together. I've alluded last week to this endeavor, which is inspired by the much bigger, much more well funded Ontario School Library Impact Project. Thanks to Dawn and Sarah W, as well as Sarah R from OLA who acted as an advisor, for discussing it at a lunch meeting on April 14 and agreeing to see what we three could do. In addition to the TMC7 paper I'm writing about the Forest of Reading (ergo the need to publish those documents so they could be cited), I'm excited to attempt this inquiry as well.

5) The return of the Early ON preschoolers to the school library

I am delighted by the return of the 2-4 year old learners to the school library. Miss Kitty, the Early ON program coordinator for our area, met with me and together we figured out a way to squeeze time together. It's shorter than our previous collaborations (15 minutes instead of 40 minutes) but we are ensuring that the time is chock-full of meaningful moments. Big thanks to Jennifer Cadavez for brainstorming with me ways to infuse literacy, social skills and school routines into such a brief time slot. Thanks also to Connie Chan for combing her resources to offer suggestions and to Steve Tong for allowing me to steal items from his kindergarten class to use. It's been a lot of fun so far.







Monday, April 11, 2022

Reading and Writing TMC Texts

 On Wednesday, April 6, I was part of a panel arranged by the BCTLA (British Columbia Teacher Librarian Association) to discuss the process of individuals developing a submission for Treasure Mountain Canada.


Traditionally, the submissions tend to be written in nature. They don't have to be. My friend Jennifer Brown's last contribution to TMC6 was a series of reflective podcasts. I like the idea of pushing the envelope in terms of ways we demonstrate and share our learning. Joseph Jeffery made a great point about that when he mentioned Indigenous Epistemologies and research methods. 

As I mentioned during the April 6 event, I've created five texts for various TMCs. 
  • A Participatory Action Research Approach to Developing Understanding of the Learning Commons in an Elementary School As Explored by Students (for TMC1 2010 in Edmonton)
  • Purposeful Play: Games Based Learning in School Library Learning Commons (with Denise Colby for TMC4 2016 in Toronto)
  • Climbing Mountains: Methods for Mentoring Teacher Librarians (for TMC4 2016 in Toronto)
  • Founding Father Fighting to Toppling Tarnished Tributes: The Impact of Social Media, Primary Sources and Equity Education of a Kids Guide to Canada Prime Ministers Project (for TMC5 2017 in Winnipeg)
  • Towards an Understanding of the Impact of Youth Involvement in the Purchasing of Resources for the School Library Learning Commons and Issues of Equity in Participant Selection (for TMC6 2020 in Toronto)
I plan on doing two more for TMC7 in New Westminster, British Columbia. More on that later. During my super-short talk, I mentioned three tips that I found personally helpful when creating my own TMC artifacts.

  1. Pick something you are interested in exploring.
  2. Find someone to chat about it.
  3. Don't sweat the research or final product.
The title of this blog post mentions reading and writing (or I guess I should have said "consuming and creating" to avoid the presumption that they are all filled with words). April 8 was the final day of my Queen's University Teacher Librarian Specialist Additional Qualification course that I facilitated. The end project is the creation of a submission for Treasure Mountain Canada.

I am ridiculously delighted with the end products of the three course candidates that I had the incredible honour of working with from January to April 2022.

  • Francis Ngo
  • Lindsay Carriere
  • MB
The official deadline for TMC papers for the seventh symposium is October 1, 2022, but these three dedicated professionals have their papers completed in time for the end of the AQ course (April 8). They did an incredible job searching the literature for evidence, reflecting on their personal practice, and crafting papers on topics that will be of great interest and benefit to the field of Canadian school librarianship. 

It's not time for me to put my feet up and relax. I am starting the spring session of York University's Teacher Librarian AQ courses (and when I last looked, there were 19 people enrolled in one of the three levels) AND it's time for me to start writing my own TMC contributions.

Even though it's going to be a lot of work, I'm looking forward to the journey. I am a "data nerd" and I've been collecting data on one of these topics since 2011, so I'm excited to see the patterns and trends.

My first paper is tentatively titled "The Forest of Reading and the Agency Thief" but I'm still toying with images and analogies like "Rebuilding After the COVID Fire Hit the Forest of Reading". It's all about the steps I'm taking to try and reinvigorate the reading patterns disrupted because of these past two and a half years.

My second paper will be a collaboration with one or two secondary school TLs and riff on the findings from the Ontario School Library Impact Project. This one will take a bit more effort but I think it will actually help shape my professional practice (and that of other elementary TLs) if we can pull it together.

Some of you may be wondering, "Why? Why go to all this effort? You aren't paid for this." Let me end this post with a few reasons why it is worth conducting action research and sharing the results so publicly. Some of these points (the ones without the inquiry questions attached) were part of the BCTLA talk. If you missed the talk, OSLA will be providing a session for people interested in contributing to TMC in June 2022.

  • build personal accountability (What am I doing to become a better TL?)
  • contribute to the knowledge bank of school librarianship (How can what I am doing help others?)
  • mentor and support other school library professionals with concrete examples (How can I share?)
  • create an excuse to travel to other parts of Canada (When I can network with these smart folx?)
  • gives evidence on your practice
  • fills need for research on school librarianship
  • assess assumptions about practice
  • inform future practice
  • deepen understanding across the profession
  • makes the case for why TLs exist in schools and the difference they make

Monday, April 4, 2022

Sourcing Resources

I found out that several teachers I know, including many that I like and respect, purchase resources from Teachers Pay Teachers. This made me feel a combination of surprise and, dare I say it, disappointment. 

Let's back up. First of all, what is TPT? 

The website says, 
Teachers Pay Teachers is an online marketplace where teachers buy and sell original educational materials.
Why would teachers turn to TPT?

Educators are busy people. Excluding the other aspects of their jobs (i.e. staff meetings, classroom setup, school events), the three big pillars are planning, teaching and assessing. The teaching part takes up much of the instructional day. Marking, especially when it comes close to report card time, steals huge chunks of time. Factor in the non-teaching portions of life (e.g. eating, sleeping, taking care of yourself and your family) and it's understandable why purchasing pre-made materials can be seen as a time-saver. If you are not familiar with the topic or subject, it's easier to turn to someone who is seen as an expert to provide lesson ideas and activities. For teachers producing material for TPT, it supplements their income and rewards them for their labor. Some may not see the difference between buying a lesson guide from Pearson or Nelson (big education publishing companies) and buying from TPT. They might actually see it as "eliminating the middle man". 

What's the problem with TPT?

EdSurge wrote an excellent article in 2021 that explained the issues. Author Stephen Noonoo used the example of Canadian writer Jenny Kay Dupuis and the exploitation of her book, I Am Not a Number. Edweek's 2018 article focused on the financial duplicity that occurs. This 2019 MiddleWeb blog by Brent Gilson mentions both the equity aspects and the intellectual property angle. The major arguments against using TPT can be summed up as:
  • copyright violations (plagiarism)
  • no vetting process (poor content quality)
  • racist, sexist, erroneous content
  • people selling others' work that they offer for free elsewhere
I'd add that teachers should be the experts on their students and no pre-bought package fits perfectly with everyone; it has to be modified and tweaked to suit the audience.

Am I against educators making money off things they produce? No. The very first publication credit to my name is a book study guide for the novel Pinballs for a company called S&S Learning Materials.

Alternatives

Maybe we need to do a better job in publicizing where educators can obtain free or nearly-free, properly reviewed lesson plans.  



Some Ontario subject associations provide teaching materials. I know that OPHEA, the Ontario Physical and Health Education Association has saved my bacon many times this year with their Teaching Tools resource bank. Two weeks ago, I wrote about all the activities AML, the Association for Media Literacy, have been up to. On their website, they have a huge and growing collection of media literacy lesson plans and prompts. The Ontario History and Social Science Teachers' Association OHASSTA has links to presentations given at their conferences. OESSTA (Ontario Elementary Social Studies Teachers' Association) has lessons linked to the Sikh Heritage Museum of Canada and the Aga Khan Museum. STAO, the Science Teachers Association of Ontario, has a repository of lessons that you can even search by grade. CODE, the Council of Ontario Drama and Dance Educators, also has lessons that you can access if you are a member. 

I'm also going to suggest that teacher-librarians can help fill this hole. Collaboratively planning and teaching with classroom teachers means that great materials can be developed. For instance, I know about two talented educators (Farisa Rahman and Salma Nakhuda - Salma is a fellow teacher-librarian) who are part of the Muslim Educators of Toronto Association. They recently published curated resources about Ramadan, freely available to everyone using this link - bit.ly/Ramadan2022meta

I myself am in the process of making some Grade 3 social studies materials dealing with the Black Loyalists. It's not ready yet but I promise to post the finished resources here so that others can use them. 

Can I also promote other cool tools I've found as I've "wandered" online? These are related to social studies, a topic that can be quite challenging to approach in an age-appropriate way for primary division students.

https://wikitrivia.tomjwatson.com/ = Wikitrivia is a fun, free, version of the card game Timeline.

mymaps.google.com  = Recommended to me by both Juli Mori (secondary teacher) and Kerri Commisso (elementary teacher), it's a great way to personalize maps and make them meaningful and relevant. The bonus is that the students can co-create them with you, depending on their age and skill level. 

My husband cautioned me on beginning my blog the way I did. He did not want me to insult or alienate my colleagues. I'll end with reiterating support for my fellow educators. It is a symptom of some of the problems with the system that teachers are not provided with time to adequately develop their own resources and/or are given resources that respect copyright, are culturally responsive, and are well-written. I'm told there are good materials available but that one has to look with a critical eye. I still think you are great teachers and I will try my best as a teacher-librarian to support you so that you do not need to spend your hard-earned pay on these items in the future.